Skip to content

Shaquita Yarbrough wants to reexamine code and policy to increase housing inventory

"Living in Longmont has never been more expensive."
phil-hearing-IYfp2Ixe9nM-unsplash
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

Longmont City Council candidates were asked to answer a survey on affordable housing by the East County Housing Opportunity Coalition, or ECHO, — a nonprofit organization that educates, informs and trains East Boulder County residents about local affordable housing needs, according to the website

On the site for the survey, ECHO announced that any candidates not represented did not return the questionnaire. 

The following are the answers provided by each candidate along with the questions asked. To keep each entry short the responses are broken up by candidate through a series that will be published throughout the week. 

Shaquita Yarbrough

1. What is your 10 year vision for affordable housing in Longmont? 

Living in Longmont has never been more expensive. We need real solutions, not just rhetoric.  This means looking closely at our codes and policies to find ways to increase inventory and access. 

2. Longmont has a goal of achieving 12% affordable housing by 2035. Is this the right  goal? What concrete proposals would you add to city policies to meet or exceed that  goal?  

I cannot address this because we don’t have the right data to make informed decisions. In 2016,  the City of Longmont conducted a comprehensive study of homeless services and gaps. Not  once in the entire report does it mention racial or ethnic demographic data. Without  understanding the population and the disproportionate impact on communities, we cannot  create solutions that will truly meet the needs of those who are most marginalized by current  systems. 

3. What changes would you make to the inclusionary housing ordinance in Longmont, if  any?  

Successful implementation of the inclusionary housing ordinance was an important step for  Longmont. Since 2018, we’ve seen the available units increase significantly. Unfortunately, the  current ordinance provides too many opportunities for developers to skirt their responsibility to  this community. This must be addressed in order to hit current affordable housing goals, much  less exceed them with the increasing demands.  

4. Will you proactively promote more affordable housing at transit stops designed to get  people out of their cars, including greater density at those locations?  

Yes. I will also recommend and push for transit stops and bike/walking paths at locations that  are already dense but have limited access to them. 

5. What does smart growth mean to you, and how would you ensure that all new  developments are “smart”? 

Smart development means continuing to assess the myriad impacts of growth on the  community; from transportation and infrastructure needs to environmental and quality of life  considerations. In order to continue to be a thriving community, growth must occur, but not  without bonds or careful assessment.  

6. What do you understand about the history of racism that has led to People of Color  owning less property, and thus having less wealth than white people? What policies  would you actively support to make up for years of racism in housing policy?  

The historic exclusion of people of color from our economic systems is longstanding and well documented. Examples such as the inability of black soldiers to use GI Bill funds post WWII,  when so many boomers received educations and started to develop financial reserves and  generational wealth, or the historic exclusion of monolingual Spanish speakers from accessing  mortgages, to redlining, which did take place in Longmont, come to mind. As a black woman  who continues to struggle to purchase housing, I feel these effects to this DAY. We must  address them with a holistic process of analyzing current programs, understanding  demographics (ie: who is currently utilizing down payment assistance, what are barriers to access for people of color), and constantly assessing housing policies and codes for racial  implications.  

7. Do you think neighborhood opposition should be able to derail development projects  that are consistent with the pre-approved goals and values of the City? Please  explain.  

No. We’ve seen in other communities where NIMBY advocates have derailed important and  necessary projects. Communities that sway to the will of a few over the needs of the many will  become increasingly elitist and inaccessible. Longmont has significant processes and protocols  that will be followed during vetting of development projects.  

8. Do you see a role for the City in limiting vacation rentals and investor-owned property  as a way of keeping housing costs down? Please explain. 

I continue to hear from constituents about the issues they are experiencing in their  neighborhoods with vacation rentals being purchased by out of state investors, and disrupting  true neighborhoods. I would need to explore ways to address this at the City level.  

9. Would you support lifting the state statute banning rent control. ____yes _X_no. Explain.  

10. Is there a role for local government in enforcing Colorado’s warranty of habitability  laws? _X_yes ____no. Explain.  

City Council has recently discussed whether to require licensing of rental units. This  would ensure habitability. As of now, the discussion has been postponed until additional  study can be conducted.  

11. Would you support changing height restrictions to create more affordable housing?  _X__yes ____no. Explain.  

There are areas of the City that would allow for greater height in developments, for  greater density. Again, all options must be explored. 

12. Would you support a program to create deed restricted accessory dwelling units?  X_ yes ___ no If yes, what would you do to make this happen in our community? If no, why? 

I would start by hearing directly from the community to understand the current  implementation of Longmont’s ADU program and how deed restriction would impact that.  There have been multiple communities in a similar situation – rising median housing costs and  wealth stratification – who have used deed restricted ADUs as a way to increase affordable  housing.  

13. Would you support changing single-family zoning to allow for more homes? _X_ yes  ____no. What commitment would you make to ensuring this happens, and in what  time frame? 

Again, this requires additional study and feedback. There are too many populations who have  been historically excluded from these discussions to make specific recommendations at this  time.  

14. Would you take a leadership role in persuading council to use American Rescue Plan  Act dollars to land bank, or help mobile home park renters purchase their homes? _X_ yes ____no 

15. Would you support procurement policies in housing that create a preference system  for minority and disadvantaged businesses? _X_ yes ____no.  Would you take a leadership role on this? X_yes __ no 

16. Should our city create an eviction legal defense program like the one in place in  Boulder?  _X___ yes _____no